{"id":21057,"date":"2020-02-19T15:17:34","date_gmt":"2020-02-19T23:17:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/classic.powertactics.com\/?post_type=product&p=21057"},"modified":"2022-06-16T00:00:10","modified_gmt":"2022-06-16T07:00:10","slug":"the-lost-tools-of-writing-level-three-complete-set","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/classic.powertactics.com\/product\/the-lost-tools-of-writing-level-three-complete-set\/","title":{"rendered":"The Lost Tools of Writing: Level Three"},"content":{"rendered":"

All-in-one combination Student Workbook\/Teacher Guide. Level Three does not have separate workbooks\/guides.\u00a0378 pages.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Welcome to\u00a0The Lost Tools of Writing Level III<\/em>, the next stage on your journey to mastery of thought and communication. Through LTW III, you\u2019ll solidify the foundations that you laid in LTW I and II, develop advanced writing skills, master additional forms of persuasive address, and even begin to practice tools you\u2019ll use for the arts of verse and storytelling. Most importantly, the skills you gain through LTW III extend beyond academics to your life in the world and the deeper questions you ask in your heart and mind.<\/p>\n

The heart of\u00a0The Lost Tools of Writing Level III\u00a0<\/em>is the\u00a0deliberative<\/strong><\/em>\u00a0address, the immediate purpose of which is to determine whether an action should be taken. The bigger purpose is to grow in wisdom and prudence by practicing making difficult decisions from which you can learn principles and habits of decision making for your own life and community.<\/p>\n

When you write your deliberative address, you practice thinking imaginatively and strategically.<\/p>\n

Thinking Imaginatively<\/strong><\/p>\n

In LTW III, you imaginatively enter a historical or literary situation, in which you assume a\u00a0perspective<\/em>, generate an\u00a0issue<\/em>, find a\u00a0necessary question<\/em>, and attempt to\u00a0persuade\u00a0<\/em>your audience (the decision-maker) to act: either to implement a change (the proposal) or to maintain the status quo. To do so, you will need to get to know your audience and then present the advantages: honor and\/or utility.<\/p>\n

As always, you develop your argument through invention, using the common topics already learned plus the special topics that apply to a deliberative address. In addition, you will add three new and powerful tools to your box: the modes of persuasion, the four causes, and analogical reasoning.<\/p>\n

As we mentioned above, perhaps the most significant difference between judicial and deliberative thinking is that the former is directed toward the past and the latter is directed toward the future. The problem you run into when you have to make decisions about the future is obvious: you don\u2019t know it. In real life, that means any decision you make is, to some extent, uncertain. It takes maturity to accept this when an issue matters to you.<\/p>\n

It raises yet another challenge for you when you deliberate about a narrative: when you have completed a story, you know the whole thing, including what follows your issue. You know the future, but your audience, being stuck in the world of the story, does not.<\/p>\n

To make your address more realistic, therefore, you must\u00a0pretend\u00a0<\/em>(you can think about the irony of that later!). Specifically, when you develop your LTW III addresses, you pretend that you are in the same time frame and location as your audience, which means that you also do not know the future, including the outcome of your proposal.<\/p>\n

By pretending in this way, you create an artificial limitation on your own knowledge that matches the real limitation we all experience in reality.<\/p>\n

Practically, that means that for the sake of the LTW III deliberative address, neither you nor your audience can know or use any information or events that happen from that point forward. You are allowed to make predictions about possible results to a decision, but you cannot say that something will happen because it happened in the story. You will read how to do this in Invention Step Three below.<\/p>\n

In short, you pretend to meet the decision-maker in his situation where you assume a perspective and deliberate on the issue so that you can persuade him to act on your thesis (e.g., Hamlet should or should not kill Claudius in the chapel). You build your case with an eye to an unknown future.<\/p>\n

Please note that we use the terms \u201caudience\u201d and \u201cdecision-maker\u201d interchangeably. Your goal is to persuade this audience or decision-maker. The mention of a goal gives rise to the idea of strategic thinking, which includes identifying goals and the means to reach them.<\/p>\n

Thinking Strategically<\/strong><\/p>\n

When you develop your deliberative address, your goal is to convince your audience to perform an action. You must make a strong case and present it to your audience in a compelling manner. When you have done so, you have written a successful address.<\/p>\n

The overall strategy of a deliberative address<\/strong><\/p>\n

When you seek to show a decision-maker that he should or should not act in a particular way, you must first persuade yourself, then your audience.<\/p>\n

To do so, you ask a few questions:<\/p>\n